Just as it would be speculation to say how FDR or Truman would have dealt with the Cuban Missile Crisis.ĭavid Blight, a Yale historian and expert on slavery and the Civil War, had a bit stronger reaction to Trump’s comments, telling Mother Jones: How Jackson would have handled the lead up to the Civil War is pure speculation. Historians were quick to point out that Jackson ended his presidency in 1837 and died in 1845–respectively, 24 and 16 years before the start of the Civil War. He said, “There’s no reason for this.” People don’t realize, you know, the Civil War, you think about it, why? He was a very tough person, but he had a big heart, and he was really angry that he saw what was happening with regard to the Civil War. ![]() I mean, had Andrew Jackson been a little later, you wouldn’t have had the Civil War. There’s no present tense here, only past.Īnd now there’s this: Yesterday, the president speculated in an odd interview that the Civil War could have been averted if Andrew Jackson had been there to stop it: ![]() Just days after the inauguration, Trump commented at a celebration of Black History Month, “ Frederick Douglass is an example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is getting recognized more and more, I notice.” Enter the historians, who quickly reminded us that the great abolitionist, orator and writer had died back in 1895. ![]() If there’s a silver lining to the Trump administration, it’s that it provides some teachable moments for historians and students.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |